Administration to Vett the Trump Administration to the legal migrants for ‘anti-American’ and antisementism

Federal authorities are now being instructed to legally survive and work for anti -American, terrorist, or new guidance in the US.

The update policy, part of President Donald Trump’s broad immigration clampdown, provides us with a comprehensive discretion to cure such ideas to citizenship and immigration service, when it is decided whether to approve green card, visa or citizenship. The guidance immediately came into effect and applies to both new and pending applications.

“The benefits of America should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti -American ideologies,” said Traigeser.

Positive contribution of US citizenship applicants, Trump Administration to Weigh ‘Good Ethical Character’

He said that USCIS is committed to implementing policies that prevent American oppositionism and strengthen waiting.

“Immigration Benefits – Stay a privilege, not a right, including living and working in the United States.”

While the release did not give any clear definition of “anti-Americanism”, the USCIS referred to the Immigration and Nationality Act, which prevents people associated with terrorism, antismitism, or “world communism” from obtaining citizenship.

It was noted whether the authorities, when analyzed analysis, would weigh whether the requests of an applicant were made in accordance with the existing laws and policies.

Change comes with a new wave Immigration measures In the second term of Trump, an extended social media includes a difficult “good moral character” standard for veting and naturalization.

USCIS said that review of anti -US activity will now be converted into social media screening.

Trump is targeting non -violent and legal immigrants. American notices are starting to notice

“The message is that the US and the immigration agencies are going to be less tolerant of American opponents or antisemitism while taking immigration,” Elizabeth Jacobs, Director of Regulatory Affairs for Immigration Studies and Director of Policy, a group that advocates immigration sanctions, said on Tuesday.

Jacobs said that the government is becoming more clear in such behavior and the authorities of the practices should consider, but it was emphasized that Vivek is still there. “Agency cannot tell officials that they have to deny – just to consider it as a negative discretion,” she said.

But Ruby Robinson of Michigan Immigrant Rights Center argued that constitutional rights apply for all people in the US to apply – and predicted legal challenges.

Robinson said, “A lot of activities of this administration violate constitutional rights and need to be resolved, eventually, in courts,” Robinson said.

David J., director of the immigration policy at the Liberterian Kato Institute. Critics such as beer warned that the policy could be selected to punish dissatisfaction and political opponents.

“This is a new powerful weapon against the politically disrupted groups in President Trump’s arsenal,” Beer told The Washington Post.

Click here to get Fox News app

Jonathan Gode, managing partner of Green and Speigel Immigration Law firm, said that policy fits for Trump’s long -term approach and the administration is within its right.

“This is what was chosen. They are allowed to explain the rules the way they want,” Grode told The Washington Post. “The policy strike zone for them always has to be reduced. The law is still the same.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report,