New Delhi: Parliament disintegration, threat of election boycott, show-causal notice, charges and counter-allegation … Political performance on the Special Intensive Amendment (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar is becoming bigger and bitter. The opposition is training its guns in the Election Commission, while BJP -led NDA is supporting the “cleansing” drive of the pole body body.The opposition questions the time and in a hurry with which the Election Commission is implementing it. The move, which is currently running in Bihar, has made the opposition parties liberated, who accuse the election body of working to help in the ruling coalition in the state elections. Expressing serious concern over the ongoing drive in Bihar, RJD leader and former vice -president of Bihar has written letters to 35 major opposition leaders across the country and alleged that Sir is a pioneer for large -scale disintegration and decreasing democracy. Tejashvi Yadav has threatened to boycott the upcoming assembly elections if the EC moves forward with its practice. The Congress has supported its ally and said that the “Tughlaqi process” of special intensive amendment of electoral rolls in Bihar will be opposed on all forums and “all options are open” for the India block.Not only Bihar, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, who probably knows that her kingdom will be in the next place for EC practice, has already dared to pole body and has asked her cadre to keep a close watch.Speaking at the Trinamool Congress rally, Banerjee indicated the “real fight” for 2026, not only in the voter list, and urged the party workers to be cautious to be cautious against the efforts of the Bengali-moving voters to fulfill the “silent parj”.Leaders of several other parties have joined opposition to Parliament against the EC move, even they eagerly wait for the next Supreme Court hearing on the case for the next Monday.Accepting the petitions against Sir, the apex court questioned the time of the move, saying that it was not doubting the credibility and honesty of the Election Commission. However, the tops court refused to stop the process of calling it a constitutional mandate. The apex court said the Election Commission, “We are prima facie that the Aadhaar card, voter ID card and ration card are allowed in the special intensive amendment of the electoral rolls,” the apex court said that the Election Commission said that “Aadhaar card is not evidence of citizenship”.The BJP and its allies have strongly defended the move that the voters who are not legitimate citizens of India should not be excluded from the election process. Interestingly, the counter of this argument comes from a ruling NDA MP. An MP from Nitish Kumar’s JD (U) Giridhari Yadav has broken the rank with his party and criticized the EC move. Yadav, who said that the EC move will question the decision of the Lok Sabha elections held last year, now facing a show-causing notice from the party.“If the electoral roles were correct for the Lok Sabha elections, how can they be wrong for the assembly elections in a few months. The Election Commission should give six months time to the people and conduct a drive in the summer months, “Giridhari Yadav said.Asaduddin Owasi, president of AIMIM, who made a huge bet in Bihar elections, has alleged that under the guise of “intensive amendment”, people will be targeted and their rights to vote will be taken away.Owaisi EC provides an interesting data to question the Drive: “Between July 22 and July 23, the number of ECI’s unattainable voters jumped from 11,484 to 1 lakh voters.” “These are clear indications of administrative callsness. The results will be borne by the poorest and weakest Indians,” the head of AIMIM claims.Sir Drive comes under the backdrop of a terrible confrontation between the Congress and the Election Commission, as former party chief Rahul Gandhi alleged that elections were being “theft” in India. He also claimed that his party has discovered Modus Operandi of “Vote Theft” by studying a Lok Sabha constituency in Karnataka.Rahul today reiterated his charge and claimed that he had the “concrete 100 percent” evidence of the EC, which allowed him to cheat in a constituency in Karnataka. “I want to send a message to the Election Commission – if you feel that you are going to get away from it, if your officials feel that they are going to get away from it, you are wrong, you are not going away from it because we are going to come for you,” Rahul told reporters in the premises of Parliament House.The Congress leader alleged that the pole panel is not working as the Election Commission of India and “not doing its work”.The former Congress chief said that he would put people and EC in white color in color how “theft of votes” is being done. The Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha said, “Not 90 percent, when we decide to show you this, this is 100 percent evidence.”Responding to Rahul’s comments, the EC said it is “highly unfortunate” that instead of filing an election petition according to Section 80 of the Representation of the People’s Act, or if filed, waiting for the High Court’s decision, he has not only made “baseless allegations”, but has chosen to threaten a constitution body.Interestingly, the Congress is running a gun for the EC, a leader is a different on this issue.Salman Khurshid has said that it does not matter that anyone questions the EC as winning the election will only matter.“Anyone who is raising the question (on the Election Commission), let them go … The reality is that, finally, you will not matter until you win the election”, Salman Khurshid said last week.Obviously, the lines of war have been drawn. The EC has strongly defended Sir in the apex court and is unlikely to stop the practice. On the other hand, the opposition is convinced that the last EC aims to help the BJP in states like Bihar and West Bengal where assembly elections are going to be held in the near future.This was the last time the Supreme Court said: “We cannot stop a constitutional body from doing what is going to do it. Also, we will not let them do what they are not going to do.” A clear message for both EC and opposition parties. Slight surprise, both sides will have to eagerly wait for the next hearing before deciding their next move.
