Clapper despite the concerns of the NSA director, despite the concerns of the 2017 ICA, “normal” move to the 2017 ICA “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “)”) “)”) “) ‘)’) ‘)’) ‘)’) ‘)’) ‘)’) ‘)’) ‘)’) ” ””) ” ‘”‘ ” ” ” ” ‘”

Exclusive: James Clapper, former director of National Intelligence, allegedly directed the authorities to “compromise” the “general” “general” procedures, which, despite the concerns of the then director of the National Security Agency Mike Rogers to increase the 2017 intelligence community assessment, who said that his team did not have “adequate time”, which was not “a complete time” to review the self-confidence “. Was involved in the election.

Tulsi Gabbard, director of National Intelligence, declined the email on Wednesday. Fox News Digital obtained declassified records.

Obama administrator 2016 Russian election intervention story, ‘created’ intelligence to create a document show

Gabbard told Fox News Digital, “The major data in Russia’s Haux has spent years in cheating the American people by presenting its manufactured and political assessment as reliable intelligence.” “The email issued today confirms what we have already exposed: The 2017 intelligence evaluation was decided to compromise the standards and violate the protocol in the construction of an intelligence evaluation and came from above.”

“Clapper’s own words confirm that compliance with the order of intelligence construction was a ‘Team Sport’,” said Gabbard.

In July, Fox News Digital specifically stated that Gabard and intelligence officials said the Obama administration allegedly “manufactured and politicized” intelligence” To create a story that Russia was trying to influence the 2016 presidential election, despite the information of the intelligence community otherwise telling otherwise.

Email, a specially obtained email on Fox News Digital Wednesday from Rogers, was sent to the then Director of the then CIA, John Brainon, the then CIA director and James Comi, the then-FBI director, James Comi on December 22, 2016 at 7:00 am.

“I have just returned from a TDY abroad and updated on the current status of our efforts to produce a joint product related to Russian attention and intentions for DNC/DCCC hack,” Rogers has written. “I know that this activity is on a fast-track and people are working very hard to keep a product together that can be provided to the President.”

“However, I wanted to approach you directly to tell you about some concerns that I am listening to my people,” said Rogers. “In particular, I asked my team if they have enough access to the underlying intelligence and adequate Tim etc., which reviews that intelligence.”

Soros’s alleged ties exposed the Dickless Annex of the Durham report

“My team expressed concern at both points,” Rogers wrote. “They were clear that, at the level of staff, people are bent forward and trying to ensure that we have an opportunity to review and weigh them, but I am worried that, given the early nature of this activity, my people are not fully comfortable saying that they have enough time to review the confidence in their assessment.”

Rogers clarified by saying that he “is not saying that we are quite disagreeing, but I want to make sure, when we are asked in the future whether we can stand completely behind the paper, that we have no reason to hesitate due to the procedure.”

“I know that you agree that this is something that we should be 100% comfortable before presenting it to the President – we have a chance to get this right, and it is important that we do so,” Rogers wrote. “If the intention is to create an integrated product that CIA/FBI/NSA is jointly out that we can defend all, then we need a process that allows us to be comfortable, and I am worried that we are not there yet.”

Rogers said: “In addition, if the NSA aims is the co-writer of this product, then I expect to see the most sensitive evidence related to the conclusion personally.”

“However,” I will stand on these concerns if “intent is to make a CIA-only or CIA/FBI-writer product,” Rogers said, “I will stand on these concerns.”

Rogers wrote, “I welcome your thoughts on these points and we can do any adjustment for the process to ensure that we all have the confidence of the required level in the final assessment.”

Hours later, at 7:43 pm the same day, Clapper responded to Rogers’ email, copying Brain and Komi.

“Understand your concern,” Clapper wrote. “It is necessary that we (CIA/NSA/FBI/ODNI) are on the same page, and all supporters of the report are -” This is our story, and we are clinging to it. “

FBI starts criminal investigation into DOJ sources

“This evening, the CIA has provided the NIC full draft generated by the Ad Hoc Fusion Sale,” the Clapper continued.

Intelligence community officials told Fox News Digital that “Ed Hawk Fusion Sale” Chhoti team Brainon had put together to draft the 2017 intelligence community assessment.

Clapper wrote, “We will facilitate as much mutual transparency as possible as to complete the report, but, not much time is not parakya,” Clapper wrote. “We may have to compromise on our ‘normal’, as we should do so on such a compressed program.”

Clapper said: “This is a project that should be a team game.”

The 2017 ICA eventually evaluated that “Russia was responsible for leaking data from DNC and DCCC,” but an official flagged Fox News Digital that ICA “failed to mention that FBI and NSA had earlier expressed less confidence in this feature.”

Documents have shown that in the months that went up to November 2016 elections, the intelligence community constantly evaluated that Russia “probably not trying … to impress the election using cyber means.”

Patel found thousands of sensitive trump -deserted doors inside the ‘burn bag’ in the secret room in FBI

Before the email was sent on December 7, 2016, it was stated in the Clapper’s Talking Points: “Anti -foreign did not use a cyber attack on the infrastructure of the election to change the result of the US presidential election.”

Last month, Fox News Digital received a disaster copy of President Daily Brief, which was prepared by the Department of Homeland Security, with CIA, Defense Intelligence Agency, FBI, NSA, Department of Homeland Security, State Department and Open Source, Obama, December 8, 2016 with reporting.

President Daily Brief said, “We assess that Russian and criminal actors did not affect recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against the infrastructure of the election.” “The actors associated with the Russian government maximum compromised an Illinois Voter Registration Database and tried unsuccessfully in other states.”

But brief said that it was “excessively” that the official vote results of any state changed as a result of the effort. “

“Criminal activity also failed to reach the necessary scale and sophistication to change election results,” said.

Brief said that the office of Director of National Intelligence evaluated that any Russian activities were “probably intended to create psychological effects, such as the election process and reducing the reliability of the candidates.”

The FBI was also concerned with the inclusion of that information in the President’s daily brief.

As of December 9, 2016, a meeting was convened in the White House position Room, with the theme row began: “Summary of conclusion for PC meeting on a sensitive subject (redacted.)” “

The meeting included the National Security Council among the top officials, clapper, then CIA director John Brain, the then National Security Advisor Susan Rice, the then state John Kerry, the then Attorney General Loreta Lynch, the then Deputy FBI Director Andrew McKebe, to discuss Russia.

Records recorded by Fox News Digital Declated Meeting Records revealed that Principal “Agreed to recommend approval to some members of Russian military intelligence and foreign intelligence series responsible for cyber operations responsible for cyber activity, which try to influence or intervene, affect or intervene, if such an activity is related to a working order, which is related to an acting order, Which is by an executive order.

After the meeting, according to the office of the Director of the National Intelligence, the executive assistant of the Clapper emailed the intelligence community leaders, who work them to create a new intelligence community as per the President’s request, “who used tool Moscow and performed the work to influence the 2016 election. ,

“ODNI CIA, FBI, NSA and DHS will lead this effort with participation,” the records say.

Later, Obama officials “leaked false statements for media outlets” claiming that “Russia has tried to intervene through cyber means, if not actively affected, an election result.”

Click here to get Fox News app

As of January 6, 2017, an assessment of a new intelligence community was issued, which according to the office of the Director of the National Intelligence, “directly denied the IC assessment made in the last six months.”

Current intelligence officials told Fox News Digital that the ICA was “politicized” because it suppressed the intelligence before and after the election, showing Russia that there was a lack of intention and ability to hack the 2016 election. ”

Officials also said that it cheated the American public “IC did not assess the ‘influence’ of Russian activities,” when the intelligence community “did, in fact, assessed for the effect.”

Last month, Fox News Digital specifically stated that Comi and Brainon are subject to criminal investigation.

Last week, Attorney General Palm Bandy instructed its employees to work on criminal referral from Gabbard earlier this month. The Department of Justice is now planning to open a grand jury investigation in the alleged conspiracy to tie President Trump in the 2016 elections.