DOJ files misconduct complaint against Judge Boasberg over Trump comments

The Department of Justice has filed an official complaint alleging misconduct by Chief Justice of American District Court James Boseberg. Fox News has reviewed the complaint which was written by Chad Mizle, Chief of Staff of Attorney General Palm Bondi and addressed the Chief Justice of the United States Court of Appeal for the district of Columbia Circuit, Sri Srinivasan.

Fox News has learned that the complaint was written and filed under the direction of Attorney General Palm Bondi.

Who is American Judge James Boseberg at the center of Trump’s exile efforts?

“The Department of Justice, alleging misconduct by Chief Justice of American District Court James E. Boseberg, was presented honorably to make an inappropriate public comment about President Donald J. Trump for Chief Justice of America and other federal judges, who have reduced the integrity and fairness of the judiciary,” called Sri Mizle.

Judge Boseberg is presiding over a high-profile case, in which Al Salvador is associated with the exile of several migrants and he has talked about keeping DOJ lawyers in contempt due to his claim that his order to change his claim was not followed. President Trump has also made important remarks about Judge Boseberg.

The complaint gives details of two opportunities, on which Judge Boseberg made comments, the Department of Justice reduced the integrity and fairness of the judiciary.

“On March 11, 2025, Judge Boseberg attended a session of the Judicial Conference in the United States, which exists to discuss administrative matters such as budget, security and facilities. While, Judge Boseberg attempted to influence Chief Justice Roberts and attempted to set up about two dozen federal judges with a traditional subjects.” Although his comment would be unfair, even if he had some basis, he was worse because Judge Boseberg had no basis – the Trump administration has always complied with all court orders nor judges Boseberg identified any alleged violation of court orders to justify their unprecedented predictions. ,

Trump enemy Boseburg explained the status of Sikot migrants sent to Venezuela

“Inside Day Among those statements, Judge Boseberg began working on his predecessor trust that the Trump administration would not follow the court orders. At first, although he had a lack of rights to do so, he issued a temporary preventive order in which the government was prevented from removing the violent train de Argu terrorists, which was briefly evacuated by the Supreme Court.

,Together, Judge Boseberg’s words and deeds violate the canon of the code of conduct for judges of the United States, and, destroy the public’s trust in judicial neutrality, and warns a formal investigation. ,

Judge Boseberg ordered Rubio to mention the signal messages of Trump officials to ensure protection

The DOJ is asking Chief Justice Srinivasan to mention the complaint to a special investigative committee as an inquiry is necessary to determine whether Judge Boseberg’s conduct “prejudice for effective and early administration of court business.” The complaint also asks that Judge Boseberg was removed from the case associated with the migrants of Venezuela, which was sent to Al Salvador, “to prevent the public confidence and erosion of public confidence while moving forward.”

The case in question is JGG V Trump.

This is the second time Bondi DOJ has filed an official complaint against a federal judge. In late February, the DOJ filed a complaint about US District Judge Ana Reyes, which DOJ said what the “malpractices” of Judge Rayes during the proceedings at Nicholas Talbot et al. V. Donald J. Trump et al., Is a case brought by two LGBTQ groups challenging the executive orders of the Trump administration that prevent transgender individuals from serving in the US Army.

The reports of the complaint come at a time when the Trump administration has instigated dozens of so -called “activists” judges who have stopped the implementation of some of Trump’s comprehensive executive orders during their second White House tenure.

Judge Boseberg found himself especially at the center of Trump’s Ire and this year attacked the so -called “activists” judges, after the temporary preventive order on March 15, who demanded to block the use of Trump’s alien enemies, which were to hurry to hurry to hurry to hundreds of Venezuela citizens of Venezuela.

Boseberg ordered all the aircraft bound to Al Salvador that he immediately returned to the US earth, which did not happen.

Who is American Judge James Boseberg at the center of Trump’s exile efforts?

His emergency order touched a complex legal saga, which eventually faced dozens of federal court challenges across the country – although on March 15, he was brought before his court – and later the Supreme Court motivated him to rule on two different occasions, that the storm had violated the security of the fixed process of migrants under the US Constitution.

Boseburg, as a result, emerged as a man at the center of legal consequences.

The Trump administration officials have repeatedly excellently excellently excelled for his order and his order to determine whether he has worked in good belief to follow his orders, and Trump himself has blown the idea that Bosebberg can be impered by the Supreme Court -Supreme Court Chief John Roberts.

The complaint, month-old behavior and the allegations around Judge Boseburg are focused on- in 2002 the then President George W. Bush was tapped as a judge, at a time when he could again be brought in a major class action case by lawyers representing a former Sekot migrants.

For ACLU and other class others, lawyers asked Judge Boseberg to reopen the discovery in the case earlier this month, citing allegations of a United Nations report about the custodial status of migrants in CECOT, and the recent 252 migrants were decided to send Venezuela from the US to Alvador.

Asked at a status hearing in the court last week whether the justice department would follow the orders of the court, DOJ lawyer Tiberius Davis said he would do, “if it was a valid order.”

He also said that he would demand an appeal from the High Court.

In April, Judge Boseberg also ruled that the court had found a “potential reason” to catch the Trump administration to fail to bring the aircraft back into the US soil, as per its emergency order of March 15, and said the court had determined that the Trump administration had demonstrated the “Wilful Avhalana” for its order.

Click here to get Fox News app

The US Court of Appeals made their original proposal in April for the DC circuit, and not yet proceeding on the matter.