Political reporter
Getty imagesConservatives have said that they went out of a hotel from a hotel in Eating, they should not be kept in other hotels, flats or homes.
This comes after the High Court has given a temporary prohibition to a council Block migrants by being kept in Bell Hotel in Essex,
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Filp called for illegal migrants to be immediately deported, but meanwhile he said that alternative housing such as former military sites or barge should be used.
The government has promised to end the use of migrant hotels by 2029, cutting small boat crossings and intensifying the decisions on asylum claims.
However, it was pressurized that the shelter seekers would be placed instead, the Home Office Minister Dan Jarvis would not give specific examples.
“Different parts of the country are likely to have a series of various arrangements,” he told the BBC.
Jarvis said that the government was “watching contingent options” for the housing out of the Bell Hotel, saying that the ministers never thought that the hotels were “a long -term, durable solution”.
In June, The ministers said that the government was looking towards buying tower blocks and alumni houses. To migrants of the house.
But the High Court should take about 140 asylum seekers out of the Bell Hotel by September 12, giving the government a limited time to secure alternative housing.
Meanwhile, many councils across England are ready to follow the EPP by taking legal action in an attempt to remove shelter seekers from their areas.
Reform UK leader Nigel Faraj has said that all the 12 councils controlled by his party will “do everything in their power to follow the leadership of EPING”.
He urged the concerned people concerned about the influence of asylum hotels in their area to protest peacefully to take action on their councilors.
A conservative -run council in Broxborn, Hetfordshire also stated that it was considering similar legal action; And the reforms of the UK -led West Northamptonshire Council said that it was “considering the implications”.
If successful, further legal challenges have the ability to create more pressure on the government to find alternative housing options for migrants.
In a letter written to Home Secretary Yett Cooper, Filp said that people were “furious” about the use of hotels to hotels, while other housing options such as apartments were “badly essential by young people”.
He urged the government to organize an emergency cabinet meeting to set up a plan to deport all illegal migrants on arrival.
Filp said that the previous orthodox government’s plan to send some migrants to Rwanda, which was stopped from legal challenges, would have made it possible.
He also said that the government has also been told that there is no one of those who are kept in Bell Hotel in Eating, will not be transferred to other hotels, many businesses (HMOs), apartments or homes in homes.
Traditionally shelter seekers were placed in long -term private rental residences, but under conservatives the government was rapidly dependent on hotels, which are more expensive.
Toryse later demanded the use of pre-monitoring bases as an alternative, including a former RAF station at Vaithorsfield, Essex, home to hundreds of refugees since July 2023.
But such schemes have faced strong local opposition.
Bibbi descends from the coast of the Stockholm Dorset, which was used by Tories for shelter seekers, shutdown last year after Labor took power.
Some local residents were concerned about the impact on local services, while refugee groups criticized conditions on the board.
There has also been a protest to use shared houses as it can put more pressure on the local housing supply.
According to the latest home office data, 32,345 asylum seekers were kept in hotels at late March, below 15% from late December.
The numbers led to the peak of 56,042 in 2023 under conservatives.
The annual accounts of the house office suggests that £ 2.1bn was spent on the hotel residence between April 2024 and March 2025, which was below £ 3BN last year.
In recent years, other councils have taken legal action in an attempt to close asylum hotels in their areas, but in previous cases judges have refused to intervene.
The Epting Forest District Council, run by Conservative, successfully argued that its case was different as the hotel had become a security risk, as well as a violation of the plan law to become a common hotel.
The judge ruled in favor of the council, which made the matter “evidence of evidence” related to protests around the hotel, causing violence and arrests.
For other councils, they will have to show evidence of the High Court of local damage to follow the suit.
Most correctional councils do not have the responsibility to allow planning, which can limit their ability to introduce legal challenges.
The lawyers of the home office argued that the ruling “could affect a large extent” the government’s ability was taken by other councils on the ability to keep thousands of asylum seekers in 210 hotels in the UK if other councils took similar action.
He also warned that interim prohibitory orders “acted as an inspiration for violent protests” around other asylum residences.
The case returns in October, when a judge must decide if the Bell Hotel has illegally replaced how it is being used.
Epting noticed that thousands of people protested outside the hotel after a refugee took a refuge, accused of sexually assaulting a 14 -year -old girl.
Hadush Kebatu, 41, Refuses allegations against him,
Another person who lives in a hotel, 32 -year -old Syrian National Mohammad Sharmak, Seven crimes have been accused,
Essex police said that the protests, which were also involved in support of the shelter seekers, became violent on the occasion. Sixteen people have been accused of crimes related to disturbances during demonstrations.
