Congress MP Rahul Gandhi’s “Vote Churi” allegations on Sunday notices a reminder to the main electoral officials of the three states, Haryana and Maharashtra demanded affidavit under the oath, and Karnataka asked for documents in a specific case, which included a woman, who had disputed her claim twice in 2024 that she had voted twice in 2024.Karnataka CEO V Ambukkumar said in his second letter to Rahul, “On investigation, Shakun Rani (voter in question from Mahadevpura) said that he said not only once and twice, as you have allegedly said …” Karnataka’s CEO V Ambukkumar told Rahul in his second letter.
Mounts pressure on Rahul to file Voting letter
The preliminary investigation conducted by this office also shows that the tick-marked documents shown in the presentation are not a document issued by the polling officer, “Karnataka CEO V Ambukkumar told Rahul Gandhi in his second letter in four days. EC sources said that “Tik Marx” against Shakun Rani’s name appeared in separate list as “EC data” flagged by Rahul, which was seen fabricated on the basis of information in Form 17A, formed and maintained by the respective polling officers. Access to Form 17A is limited to authorized EC authorities and has not been shared with political parties. Parties polling agents get voting records in Form 17C, which do not have photographs. Form 17A is produced only when a court wants it.Maharashtra Chief Electoral Officer S. Chacklingam, who first wrote to the Lok Sabha Lop on August 7, sent a reminder to submit his “declaration/oath” within 10 days to initiate the proceedings. In its first letter, the bureaucrat referred to the dates on which the draft and final rolls were shared with the Congress, also indicating that the party did not file a first appeal with the District Magistrates or a second appeal with the Election Office. The letter specified in the letter that the election results can only be fought in one High Court. “You are humbly requested to sign an announcement/oath attached under Rule 20 (3) (B) of Registration of Election Rules 1960 with the names of such voters,” said this.In a similar notice, Haryana CEO A Srinivas presented an affidavit to administer a 10 -day oath to Rahul, which specified his allegations about votes fraud with support documents. A day after the Pressor, Srinivas said that his office had shared copies of electoral rolls with representatives of the Congress during the meetings before the elections. The CEO said that if the party suspected the fairness of the process, it would need to challenge the results of the polling in Punjab and Haryana HC and provide details of the claims and objections and objections made before the authorities. The first letter to Rahul from Srinivas was sent on Saturday.Sources said that a “fake document” shining a presser can lead to legal consequences for Rahul, including an FIR for violation of Section 337 of BNS, which determines the duration of the jail up to seven years.
