New Delhi: The Rajya Sabha on Wednesday responded to Operation Sindoor of Home Minister Amit Shah, as the opposition led by Mallikrajun Kharge disrupted the proceedings and eventually raised slogans demanding the presence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi in the House before staging a walkout.As Amit Shah woke up to speak, opposition MPs started shouting slogans and hooting, demanding that the Prime Minister addressed the upper house on the attack from India across India after the Pahgam terror attack on 22 April. In response to the ruckus, Amit Shah said, “I want to respond to those asking about the Prime Minister. I am addressing his concerns here.Meanwhile, Kharge stood up and said, “There was a demand from the opposition that PM should come home and answer.” If the PM does not come to the House despite being present in the Parliament complex, then it is an insult to the House. , Subsequently, the debate soon turned into a conflict, Shah took a sharp swipe on the Leader of the Opposition, saying, “It is ironic that the person asks to speak here, he is not allowed to speak by his party.”After the exchange, opposition MPs came out of the Rajya Sabha in protest, demanding a response from Prime Minister Narendra on Operation Sindoor.Later, when the opposition came out, Amit Shah informed the house about a new anti -terrorism operation “Mahadev”. “On Monday, our security forces operated Operation Mahadev, killing three terrorists involved in the Pahgam attack,” he said.Meanwhile, Congress leader Jeram Ramesh posted on X, “India’s parties are still out of the Rajya Sabha, insulting the Prime Minister, who refused to be present in the House at the end of the 16-hour debate on the OP Sindoor-Pahalgam terror attack, talk alone as a response to the discussion.”
Amit Shah’s speech on Operation ‘Mahadev’, ‘Sindoor’ in the state Saha
Amit Shah on Wednesday responded to the government’s criticism of the opposition on the Pahalgam terror attack during the debate of Operation Sindoor.The Union Home Minister said, “I know why these people (India blocks) are walking out – they are doing this because, for years, they did nothing to stop terrorism due to their vote bank politics … that’s why they cannot even tolerate to listen to this debate,” the Union Home Minister said.
Pahalgam on terrorist attack
“In Pahalgam, our citizens were brutally killed, elected and shot in front of their religion, after being asked by their religion. I expressed my heartfelt condolences to all of those families who lost their lives.
On operation vermilion
- “We attacked him (Pakistan) terrorist camps, pads launching terror and terror training camps, but he (Pakistan) considered it an attack on his country as an attack. As a response, as a response, on 8 May, Pakistan attacked residential areas and defense installations in India. India attacked and destroyed 11 defense establishments of Pavistan.
- “They (opposition leaders) are asking who the ceasefire took place at the request of whose request was done. Pakistan, brought to his knees, called the Director General of our military operations (DGMO) and pleaded to stop. From the very beginning, we were not war, we were not war, nor we were also trying to raise this matter, some people were trying to raise this matter and raise questions …
On Operation Mahadev
- “For the security forces behind Operation Sindoor and Operation Mahadev, who brought respect in India, I expand my heartfelt gratitude and salute their bravery. I also want to praise my deepest for Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who pledged to reply to the firm as per the wishes of 1.4 billion Indians.
- “Under Operation Mahadev, our armed forces successfully killed three terrorists. Among them, Suleman, a commander of Lashkar-e-Tabiba (Late), was identified as a person who set fire to the firing during the Pahlgam attack. Lashkar-e-Tabiba’s participation in or was an unbearable form in the Pahlgam attack.”
- He said, “During the security review meeting held after the Pahalgam attack, it was decided that terrorists should be arrested as soon as possible. More severe, measures were taken to ensure that they could not flee the country. As a result, 100 days after the attack, criminals were located and neutralized,” he said.
- “Intelligence Bureau (IB) came to know about the location of terrorists on 22 May. After this, IB and military intelligence further investigated. Around July 22, their exact location was identified. Three terrorists were killed. I have received many messages from all over the country, especially from families of those who were actually killed,”
Chidambaram attacks, Congress -led UP era criticisms
- “Chidambaram ji raised a question, asking that the terrorists were Pakistani. He openly challenged the justification of Operation Sindoor. It raises an important question: Who was trying to protect Chidambaram ji, Pakistan, Lashkar-e-Tabiba (late), or terrorists themselves?” Shah asked.
- “Interestingly, the day he raised this question, the terrorists were neutralized, underlining the urgency and need of such operations. Chidambaram ji’s statements reflect the mindset of the Congress party, which is ready for votebank politics, terrorist salts to bow towards supporting Pakistan.”
- The Union Home Minister said, “The people of this country are looking at the mindset of the Congress party. Their priority is not national security, but politics. Their priority is not to end terrorism, but to protect their vote bank. Their priority is not securing our boundaries, but is involved in appeasement politics.”
