BBC News, Norfolk
EPA/Tolga AkmanMore than a dozen people have been arrested at Norwich City Center to show support for Palestine’s action, which has recently been prosecuted by the government as a terrorist organization.
The Norfolk police said 13 people were arrested outside the city hall during the protest, showing the “support” to 13 people for the group, which started from 12:30 BST.
He was held on suspicion of displaying an item in support of an accused organization, unlike Section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
Five people were taken to the WiMondam police station for questioning, while the other eight were de-defined after giving their details to the police.
A 14th person had a sign seized by the authorities.
Bal said that the protest was over 14:00 BST.
Supta Wes Horganigold said: “We will always work to facilitate peaceful opposition and protect the democratic rights of the assembly. However, the work of this group was illegal.
“The role of our officers is to prevent disorders, damage and disruption in the local community and they will use their powers to do so. Any violation of the law will be dealt with.”
The arrest was made a day after the Metropolitan Police prosecuted 60 people to support Palestine’s action.
The force stated that the group was banned on 5 July after the arrest of more than 700 people, which included 522 in Central London last Saturday.
More prosecution is expected in the coming weeks, and arrangements have been made “If necessary we will be able to check and prosecute important numbers every week”, Met said.
The action of Palestine was banned by Home Secretary Yett Cooper after criminal damage to the aircraft at RAF Bryz Norton.
As a result, membership or support for the group is a criminal offense, which is a jail sentence up to 14 years.
Cooper said that ban “Group” was based on “Group”, “as well as” plans and ideas for further attacks “.
,
Last month, the High Court ruled that Palestine would be able to take action Challenge its prosecution,
The lawyers of the group co-founder Huda Ammori argue that the restriction violates the right to free speech and acts as a gag on legitimate opposition.
