Stop the opportunity left to treat Southport Killer, reviews

The Remote Counter-Terrorism Scheme missed an opportunity to intervene in the life of Southport Killer, ending a major review.

Lord David Anderson K.C.

He said that the government program should focus on changing people suffering from extreme violence, even if the anti-terrorism police do not get any evidence of the ideological purpose.

The teachers warned the officials to stop three times that Rudakubana was suffering from violence – but their case was closed on every occasion as they did not have a identifier terrorist motive.

The review also saw an Islamic State supporter failures in separate and pre-handling, which in 2021 killed MP Sir David Amace in a constituency surgery in Leh-On-C.

Lord Anderson, The Independent Preventive Commissioner, also called the prevention system to identify future attackers with his public social media activity – and said that the plan should be part of a comprehensive plan to identify those who could carry out acts of excessive violence.

Rudkubana Giring life imprisonment with at least 52 years For the assassination of Babe King, 6, Elsey Dot Stancomb, 7, and Ellis Dr. Silva Agir, 9, followed in a Taylor Swift-Theme workshop at Southport, which was equipped with knives.

He seriously injured eight more girls and two adults, who tried to stop her.

Between 2019 and 2021, teachers asked to stop Rudakubana thrice, a national duties alerted police and other agencies to potential extremists.

In every region of the UK, under the police chaired by the police, a local panel of agencies, assesses whether a person with a flag needs experts such as counseling to change their ideas.

But on every occasion, the teachers flagged off Rudakubana, their case was dismissed.

Lord Anderson said that he appreciated the teachers who had expressed concern, but said that prevention failed to take opportunity to work. This will be for the Judge -led Southport Public Investigation to investigate the decisions taken by individual authorities.

Senior Barrister said, “This is a failure of the system. What I have seen is enough for me to ensure that there is a need to learn lessons from Rudakubana.”

“It should be clarified that these so-called violence-prone people come under its purview.

“Although Axle Rudakubana had a passionate interest in excessive violence … he did not have a certain ideology.

“This means, in strict laws, he could not be punished as a terrorist.

“Does this mean that nothing should have happened to him to stop? It is not.

“Already guidance was saying that if people had these so -called mixed, vague or unstable ideologies, or in fact, if they were obsessed with school genocide, which was definitely one of their interests, they were eligible to stop a lot.”

Lord Anderson said Rudkubana could have been sent to an expert patron, which, in turn, could be able to replace it.

“It doesn’t always work, but if you get the right mentor at the right time, the effect can be quite remarkable,” he said.

“No one can know if this would have happened in Rudakubana. But the prevention was given a chance. It did not take this opportunity. And it is very, very regrettable.”

Lord Anderson said that prevention was to do “its own games” in the online world, where now the most radicalism occurs.

He said that in the case of Rudkbana, a teacher had reported some extreme materials looking at the school – and there may be opportunities to see what he was posting online.

Prevention should spend more time to see what potential extremists are posting publicly, they said, and this work can be done without asking police and MI to dedicate secret resources and secret intelligence information without asking for someone who cannot be dangerous.

In the case of the murder of MP Sir David Amace in 2021, the teachers flagged off the police that Ali Harbi Ali was potentially dangerous, and a prevention panel in London sent an expert mentor to meet the teenager and challenge his developed ideology seven years ago.

But only one meeting of the patron was with him and his case was stopped without sure whether he had changed.

Lord Anderson said, “In the case of Ali Harbi Ali, the way there was a link to failures in the way the work prevents,” said Lord Anderson.

“They were a result, roughly human error.

“All types of procedures are in place, all kinds of guidance, all types of training, and I conclude that, taken together, those changes are very less likely that that kind of human error will happen again.”