New Delhi: While registering a strong protest, the All India Trinamool Congress has decided not to nominate any of its members in the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC), which was established to establish the committee to investigate the controversial bills providing to arrest the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers and Ministers for 30 days, the committee is called ‘Far’. TMC also said that the Samajwadi Party will also not be part of the committee. Constitution (one hundred and thirty amendments) Bill 2025, Government of Union Region (Amendment) Bill 2025, and Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization (Amendment) Bill 2025, were introduced in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday and a JPC was mentioned in the Lok Sabha.“We oppose the 130th Constitution Amendment Bill at the stage of introduction, and in our view JPC is a distant. Therefore, we are not nominating anyone from the All India Trinumool Congress, “TMC on Saturday announced in an official statement issued by the office of National General Secretary and Lok Sabha MP Abhishek Banerjee.Later, TMC leader and Rajya Sabha MP Derek O ‘Bryan in a blog post “Modi-Shah has converted Parliament JPC into stunts” said, “AITC and Samajwadi Party (SP), other largest opposition parties in Parliament have jointly nominated any member for a gentle (JPC). Bill, Committee is called’ Faras’.He said, “The Modi alliance is a stunt to investigate a ‘unconstitutional bill’ to create this JPC, which has been done to create a distraction from special intensive amendment (sir -vote theft). Some need to call stunts a stunt. I am happy that we did,” he said.The TMC leader shared the reasons that he feels that JPC is a practice in futility. “The Speaker of JPC is decided by the speaker of the Lok Sabha and the President of Rajya Sabha, may be required as consultation with each other, and its members are later nominated by each party according to the party’s strength. It slakes these committees towards the ruling majority due to their number in homes, ”said the TMC leader. He went home on the fact that “JPC President must have been a BJP MP.”He said “There is no consensus on the final report in almost every JPC”. “Whenever significant amendments are proposed by an opposition MP, they are defeated by hand performance in the revision committee. The ruling party uses its cruel majority to do so. It has become a trend, “he said.The TMC leader further said that instead of coming to these meetings with open minds, MPs represent the Treasury Bench and “stamping the ideas of the ruling party”. “In the opposition, holding an alternative scene, he has gone out,” he said and said “the only support is left for a dissatisfied note – for the record”.The Post Brian was also reflected on previous examples from 1987, 1992 and 2001. “In the 1987 Bofors case, it was alleged that a Congress member took a bribe by dealing with the shooting of the Bofors shooting and buying scooter guns. The JPC report was boycotted by the opposition to highlight.“When Harshad Mehta Scam (1992) surfaced, a JPC was established to interrogate the allegations that Mehta gave funds to Maruti Udog Limited and provoked a major fall in the sense. However, the recommendations were neither accepted nor implemented, “he said.He said, “During the stock market scam (2001), the Madhavpura Mercantile Cooperative Bank in Ahmedabad had performed a big performance for the stock market, pre -etiquette stockbroker Ketan Parekh. JPC suggested the rules of the stock market, which later diluted,” he said. Citing these examples among others, Bryan highlighted that the JPC was originally conceived as a democratic and deliberate mechanism, which were installed through the movements passed by both houses of Parliament and endowed with extraordinary powers, such as calling witnesses, demanding documents and examining experts.The TMC leader said, “However, this objective has erased to a large extent after 2014, JPCS is being manipulated rapidly by the government in power. Now, the same committee that represents public accountability, procedures have been sidelined, the opposing amendments have been rejected, and the partisan is replaced by full.”
