Trump’s Russia’s strategy of restrictions will work, can take ‘year’ to end war: experts

President Donald Trump’s perspective with Russian President Vladimir Putin pushed to a large extent in this month, when the first time returned to the White House, he not only confirmed his support for Ukraine in NATO’s weapon agreement, but also issued an ultimatum to Kremlin Head.

Warning came in a clear message: enter into peace agreement with Ukraine or face rigorous international restrictions on your top goods, oil sales.

While the move has been chased by some people, it has been questioned by others who argue whether it will be enough to prevent Putin’s ambitions in Ukraine. A security expert is arguing that the plan will work, but it may take years to be effective.

The NATO chief has praised Trump’s weapons sales as a ‘important’ step that can force Putin to interact

“I think it will be effective, and he is going to stick to that strategy. He is going to proceed to Putin to return to the bargaining table and interact in good faith, not come to the bargaining table, promises that there is no plan to keep Russians,” Fred Flaze, who acts as a sub -assistant of Trump, and acts as a result of the national security council during the first period of the President, who serves as a sub -assistant of Trump, which is a sub -subsidiary of Trump, which is the first period of the President, who works as a sub -assistant of Trump, which is the first period of the President. Fox News Digital told.

“This is not going to tolerate something Trump,” Flitez said. “We will see that it is the first six months of Trump Presidency. It may take a few years to solve it.”

But Trump campaigned on ending wars in Ukraine and Gaza, which has proved to be more complicated than suggested by the campaign mark. And Not everyone in the Republican Party When it comes to Europe, a staunch trump supporter, Rape Marjori Taylor Green has supported his approach.

Green said on X, “We do not want to give or sell Ukraine or involve any exotic wars or continue the never ending flow of foreign aid.”

Flaytz pointed to Trump’s decision and directly attacked Iran and argued that it reflected Trump’s ability to be agile as a leader.

“He saw intelligence and felt that it was getting very close, and he decided to accommodate his policy, which was the first diplomacy,” Fletz said.

“But Trump also specified something very important. He told his supporters,” I came with a concept of America-first approach to the US national security, and I decide what is in it, “Fletz said. “They owe this approach, and will adjust if necessary.”

Trump says that we will send Patriot missile to Ukraine, say that Putin talks well and then he bombs everyone ‘

Although Trump made it clear from the trace of the campaign that he wanted to play Europe a leading role in the war in Ukraine, last week he made a prominent talk to some people within his party, including which was involved. Vice President JD Vance.

Vance has argued against inciting Ukraine and said in an op-ed last year, “[It] It is not just about the dollar. Fundamentally, we have a lack of ability to manufacture arms volume, which needs to be supplied to Ukraine to win war. ,

Trump NATO agreed to sell top American weapons of nations that would then be supplied to Ukraine.

“We want to protect our country. But, finally, having a strong Europe is a very good thing,” Trump said, NATO’s general secretary sitting with Mark Rute.

Security experts have largely argued that Ukraine’s future and eventually, the end of war, will play on the battlefield.

John Hardy, Deputy Director of FDD’s Russia program, told US MPs at the Helsinki Commission on Thursday, also known as the Security and Cooperation Commission in Europe, in a defense briefing that Ukraine needs to supply Ukraine with long distance strike capabilities that can kill major Russian missiles and drone plants.

‘Trump has changed the game’: NATO enters the brave new era under our pressure, Russia

“Ukraine should not be banned only to shoot ‘arrow’,” said Hardy. “An optimal approach will combine both crime and defense. Ukraine needs to be ‘arrester’ and factories are able to make ‘arrows’.

“Putin will continue his unprotected war as long as he believes it is durable and provides a path to achieve its goals,” Hardy argued. “By enabling Ukraine to protect Ukraine’s own sky and increase rising costs on Russia’s war machine, we can be able to change that calculus, by enabling Ukraine to pressurize the Russian economy and eliminate Russia’s aggressive capacity on the ground.”

But Flaytz, who serves as a vice chair of American Security for the US First Policy Institute, said that he believes that the war would end only when a ceasefire agreement would be secured.

“I think perhaps going to be an aristis, where both sides would agree to suspend the fight,” Fletz said. “Someday, we will find a line where both nations will agree to stop fighting.”

Finally, he believes that it would agree not to join NATO for a certain period by Ukraine, although with the understanding of Moscow that the Kiev would be heavily armed by Western colleagues.

Click here to get Fox News app

He said, “I think there is a way to do this where Russia will not be concerned about increasing the Western European influence in Ukraine, and Ukraine will not worry that Russia would once attack a ceasefire or ceasefire,” he said. “Perhaps this is a pipe dream, but I think the most realistic way of stopping the fight.

“We know from history that it takes time in this way; the peacock takes time,” Flaytz said. “I think over time, Trump is going to have an impact on Putin.”