Heads of the UK National Institute for Artificial Intelligence (AI) have stated that they admit employees that in recent months they have been “challenging” for employees because donations go through enough “changes.
It comes after Employees raised “serious and rising concerns” The Charity Commission was presented this week in a whistleblowing complaint.
He warned that the body – which receives £ 100 meters from the government – Technology Secretary Peter Kyle instructed it to prioritize defense, and if it did not, it is at risk of falling after threatening to draw his funding.
In a letter viewed by the BBC, the chair Dr. Daug Gur said that the Turing Institute “will step into the time of national requirement”.
He said that it has already established a new senior work group which includes government officials and Turing Institute Staff.
However, he said that defense should not be “the only meditation” and some work on healthcare and environmental issues will continue to conform to the objectives of both the government and private investors.
Whiclebloor has described the management’s reaction as a “protestor”.
“Just talk, no action, nothing has changed,” he said, talking to the BBC on the condition of anonymity because they are afraid of losing their jobs to speak.
Dr. Guru and Chief Executive Officer Dr. Jean Ins did not directly respond to the allegations by the whistleblower about a toxic internal culture of “vengeance” and “defensive”.
The pair said that they had not seen the letter sent from whistleblower to the Charity Commission, which has been shared with the BBC.
“We are committed to operating our business with honesty, integrity and transparency and believe that the culture of openness and accountability is necessary,” he wrote, and is associated with the Whistboloeing Guidelines of the Turing Institute.
Established as the major center of AI Research in 2015, the Turing Institute, headquartered in the British Library in London, has been shaken by internal dissatisfaction and criticism of its research activities.
The change to focus on defense represents an important axis for publicly funded organization.
Both Whistbalore and Technology Secretary have said that they want new leaders in the institute – but there was no mention of any change in the management team in the letter.
In recent months many senior employees have left the organization, and the owners said that more people would either be made fruitless or their contracts will not be renewed as the restructuring continues.
