New Delhi: Before a possible expulsion motion in the monsoon session of Parliament, Justice Yashwant Verma transferred an in-house inquiry report convicted for huge illegal cash at his official residence in Delhi to leave the Supreme Court and challenge the recommendation of the then CG Sanjeev Khanna to the center of HC Judesship.Justice Verma, whose defense team is headed by senior advocates including Kapil Sibal, filed a petition while making a mistake on the process adopted by a three -member panel, who allegedly informs the panel’s conclusions about his crime, as an epidemic without evidence.Verma questions the validity of the in-house process that allows CJI to recommend the removal of the judgeInterestingly, an Jean was being filed at SC by Advocate Mathews Nedampra that day, which was demanding registration of an FIR for unaccounted cash discovered in the premises of the judge’s official residence after arriving after the fire on the night of 14 March. Several former judges of Delhi HC shared the PIL petitioner’s approach and said that only an intensive investigation by an investigating agency could highlight the money trail.In the writ petition filed through advocate Vaibhav Neeti, Justice Verma asked that Delhi Police and Delhi Fire Service personnel who had discovered cash, did not seize it or prepared ‘Panchnama’, which could have been an acceptable proof alone. He then accused CJI Khanna of uploading unconnected material against him on the official website of SC and subjected to media tests.During the investigation, Allahabad HC was renamed, the judge said that the panel report was submitted to him on 4 May and the then CJI advised him to advise them for voluntary retirement till 7 pm on 6 May, which is an intimate competent authority to initiate action to initiate action to ‘his removal’.The judge, who was stopped from judicial work, said that he was denied a personal hearing, which he had sought from CJI and Senior SC judges as per the in-house process before the in-house process, before CJI, the President and PM before CJI retired on May 8, five days before CJI Khanna’s retirement.He requested that the recommendation of SC CJI be declared unconstitutional and ultra virus. He also questioned the constitutional validity of the in-house process, which empowered the CJI to recommend the removal of the judge of the Constitutional Court.This in-house process “creates a parallel, text-constitutional mechanism from the compulsory outline under articles 124 and 218 of the Constitution, especially a address supported by a particular majority to remove judges of High Courts in Parliament, especially vested powers, after an inquiry under the Judge (inquiry) Act, 1968,”, “, he said.Justice Verma said that the power to remove the judges of the Constitutional Court was given to the Parliament by the Constitution, in which the allegations against a judge were thoroughly tested, in which the allegations were beyond the appropriate doubt for the construction, cross-execution, and evidence ‘Siddha misconduct’.Thus, the in-house process, as far as it meets the parliamentary process to recommend the removal of judges, violates the principle of separation of powers. The judiciary said that Justice Verma said that the judiciary could not accept the role reserved for the Legislature in removing judges.He said that the Constitution did not give any disciplinary or superintendent power to HC or SC judges with CJI. Thus, through the CJI in-house process, an irregular authority could not consider to act as an arbiter of the fate of HC and SC judges, he said.Justice Verma’s Challenge Mirror The Line Sibal took his YouTube show in his YouTube show last week to dissect the investigation report: Former SC Judge Justice Madan Lokur and Sanjay Kaul and Sanjay Kaul and East-Dely HC Judge Justice Mukta Gupta. In the show, Sibal argued that the in-house investigation was not in line with constitutional provisions.Kang MP for signing motion in LS against Justice VermaCongress MPs will sign the proposal that the government will bring in the Lok Sabha against Justice Yashwant Verma, saying that it will be done to set up a 3-member statutory panel which is required under the investigation of judges before the removal of judges. Party general secretary Jairam Ramesh said that the opposition will also carry forward the government to move forward on the proposal to withdraw against HC Judge Shekhar Yadav of Allahabad, which is accused of creating a “indecent language”. Ramesh slammed the non-regulation of an FIR against Verma, saying that the entire process is based on a report in the in-house panel of SC. He said that Justice Yadav violated his oath with his speech but the notice to remove him has been pending with the President of Rajya Sabha for the last seven months.
