The government has reduced the age of voting in Britain to 16 by the next general election.
The ministers argue that this step will promote engagement in democracy and the youth will have to say one in their future.
But critics claim that it can benefit labor as young people are more likely to vote for leftist parties.
The government has dismissed the idea that this is the inspiration behind the change, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rener said that it is about strengthening democracy rather than “trying to rush votes for a particular party”.
Although it is a true choice that labor suggests that labor is the most popular party in younger groups, how it can translate into real choices, it is not straightforward.
Yougov’s latest polling intention Labor is followed by a 28%increase between 18 to 24-year children, followed by greens at 26%and Liberal Democrats at 20%.
In contrast, conservatives were at 9% and improved the UK at 8%.
Some pollutants say that while the children of 16 and 17 years are not a reason to think that the young people will get away from the pattern bending to the left, with adequate voting of this age group, there is not enough voting to say how they will vote.
Anthony Wales, the head of European political and social research in YouGov, also explains that we do not yet know if the voting trend can change if labor is an unpopular manner in the next election – which is likely to be four years away.
Meanwhile, politics is fractured and labor votes are in danger of moving away by small parties.
Although the reform UK opposed reducing the age of voting and improved the old voters in last year’s general election, it is reaching the increasing number of young people on social media.
Leader Nigel Faraj has a major appearance on Tikokok, with more than a million followers.
It is not clear that it will translate into votes but the party is voting quite well among young men, although it performs poorly with young women.
On the left side, A new party led by Jeremy CorbinThose who made the youth energetic during their election campaigns as Labor Leader, possibly raised votes from newly -fledged teenagers along with Greens and Liberal Democrats.
In some countries where the age of voting has already increased to 16, research shows that the overall results have not been affected.
In the UK, 16 and 17-year-old children make about 2.8% of the population of only 16 or more, so researchers say that the party vote share is likely to be negligible.
Voting for elections is also reduced to younger groups and if it is also true for children of 16 and 17, they will also have a small proportion of voters.
Luke Treel, Director of the UK political research group, Peacock in Common, says he will not expect to be a “external influence” of this age group.
However, he says: “Then we are in an era where small shares of vote can give you a lot of seats in multi-party politics.”
The biggest impact will be more likely to be felt in individual constituencies where the MP has a small majority and a few hundred – or thousand – can create an additional voter difference on the electoral rolls.
