Your grouke chat is visible on Google: Why is this problem here
Updated on: August 22, 2025 02:56 PM IST
Are your grouke chats visible on Google? Learn everything about it before your next conversation with AI Bot.
AI security violations should not be felt as surprise. Nevertheless, thanks to more than 370,000 user conversations thanks to the clumsy share facility of the grouke, with multiple individual, sensitive materials, now publicly publicly indexed on Google, Bing and Dakdkago. This is not a fictional pair. A report by Forbes confirms this: Those unique grouke URLs created through the “Share” button lack any privacy shield. No “Noindex” tag, no access restriction, just accessible to naked links online.
The discovery results include the chat stated in the chat, private health questions, criminal planning, even instructions to make bombs. Grocke tapes may be unknown, but user identifiers in conversation can still hold investigators or trolls by hand at your digital door.
Why AI platforms are getting confidentiality wrong again
We have seen it before. Openai had to patch the same leaks after the Chatgpt share link was found in the search results. It seems that Groke has fielded that lesson in the past. Each “shared” grouke link you generates can be a privacy nightmare that is waiting to happen until XAI patchs things.
What can you do now
- Stop “Share” button – not consider those chats as private.
- Manually check and remove the shared link, then use Google’s content removal tool. It is tedious and incomplete, but better than highlighting your data.
- Use the screenshot if you have to share – they do not generate public URL and remain offline.
Should Groca and XAI fix
- Each time someone clicks, add the clear “it will be public” warning.
- Apply noindex tag or temporary/secure URL behind the opt-in system.
- Run the audit on shared material not only to ensure shocking, but also to ensure illegal or sensitive, data is not mistakenly public.
In short, it is not just shameful, it is a violation of basic belief. Share should be intentional, not careless. Grake’s misfire is a reminder: until AI platforms get their shared privacy control correct, we need to believe that our interactions are public.